2019-10-30 20:00 2019-10-31 22:00 60 Canada/Eastern 🎟 NAC: Chooi Plays Tchaikovsky

https://nac-cna.ca/en/event/21706

In her North American debut, Finnish conductor Dalia Stasevska takes the NAC Orchestra through a night of exceptional music, beginning with Modest Mussorgsky’s delightfully sinister Night on Bald Mountain, instantly recognizable from Walt Disney’s classic Fantasia –and a perfect way to start your Halloween! Hailing from Victoria, BC, guest violinist Timothy Chooi made his first NAC appearance in 2012 as part of the “My First NAC” Showcase Concert series featuring...

Read more

Southam Hall,1 Elgin Street,Ottawa,Canada
October 30 - 31, 2019

≈ 2 hours · With intermission

Our programs have gone digital.

Scan the QR code at the venue's entrance to read the program notes before the show begins.

Last updated: October 16, 2019

Reflection

The Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto is a very meaningful piece of music for me. I first learned this concerto while studying with Pinchas Zukerman at the NAC Young Artists Program in 2011. This piece has followed me throughout the years as I have performed it in important debuts and competitions over the past few years. For me, the Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto is a dream to perform as it really allows the violin to show what it does best. The luscious melodies in the solo violin are combined with virtuosic violin passages that are masterfully synchronized with a symphonic accompaniment.

Reflection

It is almost impossible for me to know when I heard Tchaikovsky’s Sixth Symphony for the first time, it almost feels like it was always there – I grew up listening to it and played it in orchestras many times. Before I dared to program this symphony, however, I took many years to study it. For me personally, a revealing moment was when I saw with what clarity and precision the work was composed. One must dare to go for all the tempi and markings that Tchaikovsky indicates, to allow this symphony to flow and speak for itself. It’s a drama at its best, with Tchaikovsky’s world as he saw and felt it, expressed in the music.

The NAC Orchestra has performed the Rimsky-Korsakov arrangement of Night on Bald Mountain many times, but tonight is the first time they perform Mussorgsky’s original score.

Eugene Fodor was the soloist for the NAC Orchestra’s first performance of Tchaikovsky’s Violin Concerto, which was given in 1976 under the direction of Mario Bernardi. The Orchestra’s most recent performance of this concerto was in 2016, with violinist Karen Gomyo and Cristian Macelaru on the podium.

The NAC Orchestra played Tchaikovsky’s “Symphonie pathétique” for the first time in 2003 with Bramwell Tovey on the podium, and most recently in 2017 with Carlo Rizzi conducting.

Repertoire

Mussorgsky

Night on Bald Mountain

Born in Karevo, March 21, 1839
Died in St. Petersburg, March 28, 1881

The witches’ sabbath of St. John’s Eve (June 23/24) is a popular legend in many European countries. The location is usually on the heights of an isolated mountain: the Brocken in Germany, Blokula in Sweden or Lysá Hora (“Bald Mountain”) near Kiev. There, witches, sorcerers, demons and hideous imps gather for a night of revelry and orgiastic abandon.

Mussorgsky finished the first version of Night on Bald Mountain in June 1867, appropriately enough, right on St. John’s Eve (June 23), according to the composer himself. He revised the score in 1872, to which he added a chorus, and again when he incorporated it into his opera Sorochinsky Fair. On October 27, 1886, five years after his death, Night on Bald Mountain was finally heard in a version collated from three earlier sources and orchestrated by his colleague Rimsky-Korsakov, who conducted the Russian Symphony Society in St. Petersburg. It was only sometime in the 1920s that Mussorgsky’s original was first performed, by the Leningrad Philharmonic, and not until 1968 that it was finally published. Many conductors today opt for the Rimsky-Korsakov version, but we hear the score tonight in its original form.

Rimsky-Korsakov’s involvement amounted to smoothing out what he considered to be Mussorgsky’s stylistic irregularities and “problems” of orchestration. He also shortened it by about two minutes and completely changed the ending, which in the original is savage and furious. However, the musical world is slowly realizing that Mussorgsky’s own style, rough-hewn and unpolished as it may be at times, has its own unique appeal.

– Program notes by Robert Markow

PYOTR ILYICH TCHAIKOVSKY

Violin Concerto in D major, Op. 35

I. Allegro moderato
II. Canzonetta: Andante
III. Finale: Allegro vivacissimo

While his homosexuality was known to close friends and family members, Tchaikovsky’s (1840–1893) concern about flouting societal convention alongside his burgeoning fame as a composer led him to marry Antonina Ivanovna Milyukova in July 1877. Not surprisingly, it was a disastrous decision—within two months, they were separated. His marriage debacle became a turning point: in 1878, Tchaikovsky left his position at the St. Petersburg Conservatory and was able to pursue composition full time due to a regular allowance given to him by Nadezhda von Meck, a wealthy widow and admirer of the composer. (Their association, conducted solely by correspondence, lasted for 14 years.) The Violin Concerto in D major was the first work he conceived and completed following his crisis.

Tchaikovsky was often plagued by insecurity when he composed, thus causing him to labour for months on a work, but the Violin Concerto came to him quickly and easily. In March 1878, while staying at a hotel in Clarens, near Lake Geneva, he was visited by the violinist Iosif Kotek, a close friend and a former student of his. Kotek showed Tchaikovsky several new works for violin, including Édouard Lalo’s Symphonie espagnole, which the composer admired. Almost immediately, Tchaikovsky was inspired to write his own violin concerto and in 11 days, he had drafted it in its entirety. He soon replaced the original second movement with a new one (on the advice of his brother Modest and Kotek, who played through the concerto as the composer wrote it), and after another nine days, the concerto was finished and fully orchestrated.

The route to the work’s premiere, however, was more convoluted. Tchaikovsky had dedicated it to Leopold Auer, the acclaimed virtuoso and professor of violin at the St. Petersburg Conservatory, hoping that Auer would give the first performance. Auer declined—as the composer remembered, “he never wanted to master the difficulties of this concerto and deemed it awkward to play”—but apparently also blocked other violinists’ attempts, including Kotek’s, to perform it. Eventually, in December 1881, the concerto’s premiere was given by the young violinist Adolf Brodsky with the Vienna Philharmonic. Reactions to the work were hostile and the Viennese press panned it with colourful insults—the critic Eduard Hanslick wrote, “It gives us, for the first time, the hideous notion that there can be music which stinks to the ear.” Over time, the concerto gained acceptance through various violinists championing it, including Auer who created and played his own edition of it. Today, it continues to be frequently performed in the concert hall. 

Like most 19th-century concertos, Tchaikovsky’s Violin Concerto is a vehicle for virtuoso display, though it’s full of memorable melodies which are inventively varied and transformed as the movements progress. There’s a feeling of playful discovery in the unfolding of the first movement, the themes of which Tchaikovsky remarked in a letter to Meck “were not forced”, and that in fact, “generally speaking the plan of this movement came into my head at once, poured forth on its own, spontaneously.” Within an otherwise standard structure, there are some unusual features. For one, the conventional orchestral exposition has been replaced by a short introductory lead-up to the solo violin’s entrance, itself a winding cadenza, after which it introduces the graceful main melody. Only after progressing through the themes and pyrotechnics of the solo exposition does the orchestra play its first extended episode. Tchaikovsky also inserted the soloist’s main cadenza in the middle of the movement (like Felix Mendelssohn did in his), just before the return of the main melody (played by flute) in the recapitulation, rather than near the end. The violin thus continues with the orchestra into the coda, where together, they rush headlong to a thrilling conclusion.

A canzonetta of tender melancholy follows. After woodwinds intone a sombre chorale, muted solo violin presents a lamenting theme in G minor, accompanied by muted strings. Later, the mode brightens to major, and the violin sings a melody tinged with warm nostalgia, as if recalling a happy memory. But the lament returns, the sadness a little weightier now, with poignant countermelodies in the clarinet and flute. It ends unresolved, as the wind chorale returns and muted strings play a series of turning motives on questioning harmonies…

Suddenly, the entire orchestra bursts in with a sped-up version of the motive which evolves into an introductory passage. Solo violin enters similarly, and toys with the motive briefly in a short cadenza that mirrors the one at the opening of the first movement. At last, it starts the dance with a merry tune that races upwards and skips back down. After continuing with quicksilver runs and leaps, the dance is brought to a halt by drone chords in the cellos, over which the violin introduces a robust theme. It gradually speeds up, suggesting a return to the merry tune might be coming, but instead, we encounter a plaintive melody of contrite tenderness, played by the oboe. The violin picks up the song and muses for a moment on its phrases, but then finds its way back to the merry dance. Thereafter, the three themes are recapped with greater virtuosic and lyrical intensity. Following the final return of the merry tune, a great orchestral crescendo culminates in an exuberant back-and-forth between soloist and orchestra that brings the concerto to an exhilarating finish.

Program note by Hannah Chan-Hartley, PhD

PYOTR ILYICH TCHAIKOVSKY

Symphony No. 6 in B minor, Op. 74, "Pathétique"

I. Adagio – Allegro non troppo 
II. Allegro con grazia 
III. Allegro molto vivace 
IV. Finale: Adagio lamentoso 

“I definitely consider it the best, and, in particular, the most sincere of all my works. I love it as I have never loved any other of my musical offspring,” wrote Tchaikovsky to his nephew Bob Davidov in August 1893, after completing the score, begun seven months earlier, to his sixth symphony. He referred to it in a letter to his publisher as his “Patetitčeskaja simfoniye”; the closest English translation is “passionate symphony”, but the French subtitle “Pathétique” adds another layer of meaning. Coming from the “grande passion pathétique” of French opera (as noted by music theorist Timothy Jackson), it refers to the genre’s engagement with “difficult”, that is, forbidden relationships. Tchaikovsky had been fascinated with such works, probably relating them to his own struggle with homosexuality at a time and place where he could not openly have romantic relationships with men. Therein lies a clue to the “secret program” he told Bob was contained in his Sixth Symphony—their unmentionable love relationship.  

While the Sixth Symphony conforms in large part to the general structure and processes of the “classic” Austro-German symphony, the secret program clearly shapes some of the work’s formal innovations, thus intensifying its dramatic arc, as you’ll read about below. Also notable is Tchaikovsky’s deliberate use of the key of B minor, in which much of the symphony is firmly planted. Generally avoided, historically, by composers writing symphonies (Beethoven dubbed it the “black key”), B minor’s association with feelings of melancholy and anguish was ideal for the expression of intense emotions concerning romantic love. (It’s worth noting that Tchaikovsky’s Romeo and Juliet Overture-Fantasy (1880) and his Manfred Symphony (1885), both of which are based on narratives about a forbidden relationship, are also in B minor.) 

The first movement opens with a slow introduction “in the depths”: over sustained tones in the double basses, solo bassoon introduces a mournful theme—an ascending sequence of sighs. It picks up speed in the ensuing Allegro; several ideas follow—a strong rhythmic phrase, a chattering motif, a brass fanfare—and the mood becomes increasingly agitated. But the initial anxiety recedes, ending in a question. The answer is given by muted violins and cellos—a gorgeous theme of deep tenderness, set in sunny D major. When it returns, following affectionate duets between flute and bassoon and clarinet and bassoon, the upper strings, against the rest of the orchestra’s pulsating “heartbeats”, take it to an impassioned climax, after which the music luxuriates, as if on a fond memory, then fades out.  

The reverie is shattered by the brutal stroke of a chord, then snarling motifs; the main theme becomes a stormy fugal episode and builds to a desperate cry exclaimed in the brass. After it subsides, the trombones intone a brief quote of a chant from the Russian Orthodox Requiem, “With thy saints, O Christ, grant peace to the soul of thy servant.” From there, the first theme’s main motif reappears, restated obsessively, eventually arriving at a full statement—it’s the recapitulation, but it won’t proceed exactly as before. Instead, it drives to a catastrophic climax, to which the strings respond with a gut-wrenching lament. After a pause, the second theme returns, this time in the luminous key of B major. Sweetly tentative at first, it becomes more confident and soars to passionate heights. A chorale in the brass, then woodwinds, closes the movement with nostalgic consolation.

As a respite from the earlier intensity, the second movement is a graceful dance, unusually in five-time, featuring a mellifluous melody initially passed from cellos to the winds, then developed by the strings, who add crisp dotted rhythms. It bookends a contrasting central section in melancholy B minor, with a tune of descending sighs above insistently repeating Ds in the double basses and timpani. In the coda, the repeated Ds return as do the sighs, now given harmonic poignancy within the serene D major mood.   

The Scherzo begins with rapid chattering between the upper strings and woodwinds; oboes quietly pipe a fanfare motif, which the brass picks up, then is developed playfully by the strings. Gradually, the music builds, eventually leading to a full march tune based on the fanfare, introduced very softly by the clarinet, then intensified by the violins. The opening material returns;later, there’s a massive orchestral crescendo, which arrives dramatically, via raucous brass and a whirlwind of strings and woodwinds, on a triumphant statement of the march theme, and drives to a confident finish. 

But now, a significant departure from convention: “the Finale will not be a loud allegro but the reverse, a most unhurried adagio,” wrote Tchaikovsky to Bob. The Adagio lamentoso consists of two alternating sections: the first, featuring a deeply anguished melody in B minor, created by interweaving notes in the strings; the second, a heartfelt song over pulsating horns in a consolatory D major. After reaching an emotional climax, the music breaks into a cascade of scales. Silence. Then a howl of grief, which subsides and leads into another cycle of the two sections. This time, the first theme builds with an even fiercer intensity, then collapses with exhaustion. Trombones intone a solemn chorale, out of which the song, now in B minor, emerges as a lament that is steadily drawn, by pulsating double basses, to the symphony’s conclusion. 

Tchaikovsky conducted the first performance of his Sixth Symphony, which he dedicated to Bob, on October 16/28, 1893, before succumbing to death, nine days later.(There’s been much speculation as to the exact cause, but to this day, it remains a mystery.) Though the symphony’s ending intimates a tragic conclusion for a love that could not see the light of day, this might not have been what Tchaikovsky thought. At the very least, in creating this work, he at last found a way to be true to himself. 

 

Program notes by Hannah Chan-Hartley, PhD 

Artists

  • Conductor Dalia Stasevska
  • timothy-chooi-cr-dan-sweeney
    Violin Timothy Chooi