Hamelin & Beethoven's "Emperor"

& Storgårds conducts the Enigma Variations

2025-02-05 20:00 2025-02-06 23:00 60 Canada/Eastern 🎟 NAC: Hamelin & Beethoven's "Emperor"

https://nac-cna.ca/en/event/36131

In-person event

Three things to know ...  One of today's most prolific pianists, Marc-André Hamelin has recorded more than 70 albums spanning four centuries of music. Beethoven composed much of his "Emperor" Concerto for piano and orchestra in Vienna while war raged outside his doorstep. In his "Enigma" Variations, Edward Elgar offers tender musical portraits of friends and loved ones.  Canadian pianist Marc-André Hamelin — whose "demon speed" (Boston Symphony) and...

Read more

Southam Hall,1 Elgin Street,Ottawa,Canada
February 5 - 6, 2025
February 5 - 6, 2025

≈ 2 hours · With intermission

Repertoire

VICTORIA POLEVÁ

Symphony No. 3, "White Interment"

In one movement 

Victoria Vita Polevá (b. 1962) is a Ukrainian pianist and composer. Born in Kyiv to a family of musicians, she studied with Ivan Karabyts and Levko Kolodub, respectively, at the Kyiv Conservatory, where she herself taught composition from 1990 to 2005. Her earlier works, such as the ballet Gagaku, Transform for large orchestra, and Anthem for chamber orchestra, favour avant-garde and polystylistic aesthetics. From the late 1990s, she became ever more drawn to spiritual themes and musical simplicity, and so she developed a style which has lately been identified as “sacred minimalism”. Polevá’s works have been commissioned by numerous exponents of new music, including Gidon Kremer in 2005 for Sempre Primavera and in 2010 for The Art of Instrumentation, and the Kronos Quartet for Walking on Waters in 2013. In 2009, her Ode to Joy was heard at a concert to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Victoria Polevá is a Laureate of the Shevchenko National Prize of Ukraine.

Polevá composed “White Interment” in 2002 for oboe and strings; the following year, she created a version of it for orchestra and gave it the title of Symphony No. 3. The central motif of the work is a rhythm based on the words “teper`vsegda snega”, meaning “now always snows”, from a poem by the Russian Chuvash poet Gennady Aygi (1934–2006). Comprised of slow-moving large blocks of sound, the single-movement symphony is, according to the composer, meant to evoke the “psychedelic emotional effects” of being physically and metaphorically enveloped by snow: from the pull of a snowstorm to being buried under a snowdrift and “falling into the abyss of a gentle sleep” as the surrounding space collapses.

The structure and musical content of Symphony No. 3 is shaped by Polevá’s use of rhetorical gestures with classical references: “Circulatio” (Latin: circle), the symbol of eternity represented by “the whirling motion of the melody”; “Catabasis” (Greek: descent, such as into the underworld); “Aposiopesis” (Greek: suddenly stopping in mid-sentence or mid-thought to conceal or disguise), a general pause depicting death and eternity; and “Anabasis” (Greek: climbing). The piece opens with layered sonorities swelling and receding; from out of this stark sonic landscape, a haunting theme on oboe emerges. Later, the oboe introduces a new circling melody which is picked up by other instruments but then peters out and stops. After a brief silence, a new section begins; it has a busy surface texture (like instrumental flurries in an aural snowscape), but the overall impression is that of a protracted descent. It culminates mid-way in an intense, almost oppressive climax, which gradually subsides. The whirling melody then returns on icy woodwinds over sonorous strings, and the music begins to climb upward, eventually breaking through to punchy chirps on flutes and a closing trumpet salvo.

Composer bio adapted from Donemus; program note by Hannah Chan-Hartley, PhD 

LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN

Piano Concerto No. 5 in E-flat major, Op. 73, “Emperor”

I. Allegro 
II. Adagio un poco mosso –  
III. Rondo: Allegro ma non troppo 

Of the published concertos by Beethoven (1770–1827), his Fifth Piano Concerto, which he composed during the winter of 1808–1809, was the last one he completed in that genre. (He started to write a sixth piano concerto in 1815 but abandoned the project with only part of the first movement written.) Beethoven dedicated Op. 73 to Archduke Rudolph, who is also the dedicatee of the Fourth Piano Concerto, among many other works. By then, Rudolph, who was a formidable pianist and Beethoven’s sole composition pupil, had become a devoted patron and friend of the composer—in February 1809, he was one of three sponsors who helped set up an annuity for Beethoven. Between the concerto’s completion in 1809 and Breitkopf & Härtel’s publication of the score in February 1811, there was at least one private performance given of it by Rudolph himself; on January 13, 1811, Johann Nepokmuk Chotek reported hearing the Archduke perform at Prince Leibowitz’s “an extraordinarily difficult and artful but not at all pleasing concerto by Beethoven…with very much technique and expression.” The first public performance of the concerto occurred later that year, on November 28, by Friedrich Schneider in Leipzig; Carl Czerny gave the first Viennese performance in February 1812 (evidently, Beethoven’s deafness was now too advanced for him to appear as soloist in his own concertos).

The nickname of “Emperor” for Op. 73 is not Beethoven’s; it seems to have been applied predominantly in English-speaking countries to signify the work’s special grandeur. Compared to the composer’s earlier concertos, Piano Concerto No. 5, as Beethoven scholar William Kinderman observes, “is cast in a more brilliant, heroic mould. Its outer movements assume a character, with rhythmic figures evocative of military style and a formal breadth reminiscent of the Eroica Symphony,” which is also in the key of E-flat major. Notably, the innovations in concerto writing that Beethoven brought to Op. 73—particularly a new brilliance in the solo part combined with symphonic procedures—would go on to influence the grand piano concertos of the later 19th century by Robert Schumann, Franz Liszt, Johannes Brahms, and many others. 

The first movement has an expansive structure with an opening that was novel for its time—a written-out cadenza of florid arpeggios and runs for the soloist triggered by imposing orchestral chords. Only after that does the orchestra start the exposition, with the first violins introducing the first main theme—a confidently striding tune. Not long after, the contrasting second theme unfolds in two parts, appearing initially in the minor mode, stated by the first violins in dainty tiptoe fashion, then in a major-mode, smooth-lined version intoned “sweetly” on horn. Later, following the piano’s gentle turn on the first theme and some ruminating flights, the second theme undergoes further transformation from a delicate triplet pattern in the minor to a beautiful meditative line in the major mode (foreshadowing the slow movement), after which the orchestra reinterprets it as a snappy march. In the movement’s central section, motifs from both themes are further developed, with a mighty passage of double octaves for the soloist in between. After a dramatic return to the bold cadenza of the beginning (though now shortened), the recap of themes proceeds as before. Near the end, at the conventional orchestral pause for an improvised cadenza, Beethoven subverts expectations by instructing the soloist not to make a cadenza (“non si fa una cadenza”) and to continue directly on to a written-out solo passage. It leads back to the second theme on horn over sparkling piano figures, which then take us into the final dazzling passages of the movement.

The second movement, with its serene atmosphere, seems to be from another world entirely. Set in the key of B major (harmonically remote from the concerto’s main key of E-flat major), it opens with muted strings singing a melody of devotional character. When the piano enters, this becomes a slow-moving hymn underneath the soloist’s contemplative fantasia. After a free variation and a cadenza-like passage, the piano returns to the opening melody, adding embellishments as it progresses. The tune is then picked up by the woodwinds and is further outlined by the first violins on the offbeats, while the piano decorates it with alternating notes. Eventually, the music settles to stillness on a B held on bassoons, then shifts downward a semitone to B-flat, now quietly suspended on horns. Over this, the piano tentatively tries out an ascending pattern of chords, which, after a brief pause, breaks out into the robust main theme of the finale. As per rondo form, this tune’s recurrences are interspersed with extended episodes featuring virtuosic elements both delicate and boisterous, all of it giving the movement a grandly sonorous effect through to its exuberant finish. 

Program note by Hannah Chan-Hartley, PhD 
 

EDWARD ELGAR

Variations on an Original Theme, Op. 36, “Enigma Variations”

Born at Broadheath, Worcestershire, England, June 2, 1857
Died in Worcester, February 23, 1934

The premiere of the Enigma Variations on June 19, 1899 marked the beginning of a new chapter in Elgar’s life. Already in his early forties, and with no reputation to speak of outside of his native England, Elgar was still regarded as “a man who hasn’t appeared yet” (his own words). The Enigma Variations changed that dramatically. Following the June premiere, Elgar slightly revised the score, extended the Finale, and saw the work played again and again to enthusiastic audiences not only in England but on the continent and in America as well. So quickly did Elgar’s fame spread now that he was knighted just five years after its premiere. He dedicated the score “to my friends pictured within.”

The identities of those “friends pictured within” constitute one aspect of the title’s enigma. Following the stately theme are 14 variations, the first and last of which depict Elgar’s wife and his own musical self-portrait, respectively. In between are found idiosyncratic orchestral descriptions of twelve men and women who played important roles in Elgar’s musical and/or social life. Each variation was prefaced with the character’s initials or nickname. Initially Elgar refused to disclose their identities, but later he published a detailed written explanation giving clues.

There is another enigma to the Variations. Elgar never revealed “its ‘dark saying’… through and over the whole set another and larger theme ‘goes’ but is not played.” This unplayed theme, a theme that “never appears,” has mystified the musical world for more than a century. Presumably Elgar’s wife and his friend August Jaeger knew the secret, but they carried it to their graves. Speculation has run to absurd proportions. Late in life the composer gave a clue: the theme was “so well known that it was strange no one had discovered it.” Musicologists tried mapping all kinds of songs and popular melodies onto the Variations, with varying degrees of failure. They tried programmatic and philosophical themes (“another and larger theme”) like intimacy, friendship and sincerity. They suggested maybe it was all a practical joke – that there was no theme at all of any kind. The enigma remains.

THEME (Enigma) – The theme appears immediately and consists of two phrases: the first, plaintive and sorrowful in G minor stated by violins in a gently climbing and falling line; the second, in G major, shared by strings and woodwinds.

VARIATION I – Without change of tempo, we are introduced to Caroline Alice Elgar, the composer’s wife, “one whose life was a romantic and delicate inspiration” in Elgar’s words.

VARIATION II – Hew David Steuart-Powell, a pianist with whom Elgar (as violinist) played chamber music, is humorously travestied as warming up.

VARIATION III – Elgar presents a caricature of actor Richard Baxter Townshend playing an old man in an amateur theatrical.

VARIATION IV – For the first time the full orchestral sonority is heard. William Meath Baker was described by an acquaintance as a “Gloucestershire squire of the old-fashioned type; scholar… a man of abundant energy.”

VARIATION V – Richard Penrose Arnold, son of Matthew Arnold, is portrayed as a man of depth and seriousness of purpose.

VARIATION VI – Miss Isobel Fitton, a violist, was another enthusiastic amateur who played chamber music with Elgar. Appropriately, her instrument is featured here, depicting a woman of romantic charm.

VARIATION VII – This variation shows architect Arthur Troyte Griffith’s clumsy attempts to play the piano and Elgar’s efforts to help him. The final slam suggests the frustration of it all.

VARIATION VIII – Here is depicted the tranquil lifestyle of a gracious lady, Miss Winifred Norbury of Worcester in her eighteenth-century home.

VARIATION IX – In the best-known of the variations, Elgar creates a moving tribute to August Jaeger. The nickname “Nimrod” refers to the biblical hunter, son of Cush (“Jaeger” is German for “hunter”). The soft glow that infuses this music grew out of a “record of a long summer evening talk,” reported Elgar, “when my friend Jaeger grew nobly eloquent – as only he could – on the grandeur of Beethoven, and especially of his slow movements.”

VARIATION X – Dorabella (later Mrs. Richard Powell) was a lady of hesitant conversation and fluttering manner. Elgar spoke of this music as “a dance of fairy-like lightness.”

VARIATION XI – It is traditional to hear in this music the capering of Sinclair’s bulldog Dan as he stumbles down the banks of the River Wye, paddles upstream to find a landing place and finally scrambles out barking.

VARIATION XII – Another amateur musician in Elgar’s circle was Basil G. Nevinson. His instrument, the cello, predictably has a featured role in this variation.

VARIATION XIII – This variation depicts Lady Mary Lygon, who was on a sea voyage to Australia at the time of composition. This gentle seascape includes quotations on the clarinet from Mendelssohn’s Overture Calm Sea and Prosperous Voyage.

VARIATION XIV – Here is Elgar himself. The composer’s assertive, self-assured side is seen here (not his more typical reserved side), and the Variations end in exultant tones. 

Pinchas Zukerman has long championed Elgar’s Enigma Variations with the NAC Orchestra, from their first performance in 2005, to the Orchestra’s most recent in 2013. Guest orchestras have frequently interpreted the work in Southam Hall, including the Orchestra of the BBC Wales, in 1983, and the Orchestre Métropolitain with Yannick Nézét-Seguin in 2015.

Program notes by Robert Markow

Artists

  • hamelin-sim-cannety-clarke-16-20-1900x1265-cropped
    Piano Marc-André Hamelin
  • storgards8-high
    Conductor John Storgårds
  • National Arts Centre Orchestra
  • hunt-mccoy-tobi-fred-cattroll-535
    Stage Manager Tobi Hunt McCoy

International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees