≈ 2 hours · With intermission
Last updated: February 8, 2019
Overture to Der Freischütz, Op. 77
Franz-Paul Decker was on the podium in 1973 for the NAC Orchestra’s first performance of Weber’s Overture to Der Freischütz. Pinchas Zukerman was the conductor for the Orchestra’s most recent interpretation in 2012.
Violin Concerto No. 1 in G minor, Op. 26
The NAC Orchestra played Max Bruch’s Violin Concerto No. 1 for the first time in 1971, with Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos conducting and Min‑Young Kim as soloist. In 2013 and 2014, the ensemble gave performances of this concerto in Southam Hall, as well as on tours in China and the United Kingdom, under the direction of Pinchas Zukerman who also played the violin, as he does tonight.
Symphony No. 8 in G major, Op. 88
In 1975, the NAC Orchestra gave their first interpretation of Dvořák’s Symphony No. 8, under the baton of Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos. Pinchas Zukerman led performances of this symphony several times during his tenure as Music Director of the Orchestra, and the ensemble’s most recent performance took place in 2016 with Rafael Payare on the podium.
The NAC Institute for Orchestral Studies (IOS) was established under the guidance of former NAC Orchestra Music Director Pinchas Zukerman, and is in its 12th season. During selected main series weeks of the 2018–2019 season, IOS apprentices rehearse and perform with the NAC Orchestra. The IOS is proudly supported by the RBC Emerging Artist Project with additional support by the NAC’s National Youth and Education Trust.
A custom-designed uOttawa – NAC Orchestra Institute for Orchestral Studies pilot project has been initiated as the result of a longstanding partner-ship between the University of Ottawa School of Music and the National Arts Centre. Five outstanding uOttawa string students have been selected for three‑week apprenticeships during the 2018–2019 NAC Orchestra season. These apprentices will play in rehearsals, with the potential of also performing in concert with the Orchestra in their weeks. You may see one or more uOttawa apprentices performing during various weeks of the season. We welcome them on our stage!
Learn more about the Institute for Orchestral Studies
CARL MARIA VON WEBER
Born in Eutin (near Lübeck), Germany, November 18, 1786
Died in London, June 5, 1826
Der Freischütz, the third of Weber’s five complete, extant operas, marked the first important instance of a national German opera. In form, it descended from the Singspiel tradition – stage works with passages of spoken German dialogue alternating with musical numbers – but in content it set itself apart from its illustrious predecessors like Mozart’s Zauberflöte and Beethoven’s Fidelio through the use of specifically German subject matter. In this respect, it set the example for later operatic expressions of national feeling: Smetana’s The Bartered Bride, Mussorgsky’s Boris Godunov, Britten’s Peter Grimes, and Copland’s Tender Land. One writer observed that the Overture to Der Freischütz could easily be the overture to one of the Grimm’s fairy tales, for the heart and soul of German folklore is embodied in this opera, involving as it does a dark mysterious forest, huntsmen, a friendly hermit, ghosts, evil spirits, a devil and a pair of lovers.
Weber selected the story from a collection of supernatural tales, the Gespensterbuch (Ghost Stories) of Apel and Laun. Friedrich Kind fashioned the libretto, working closely with Weber. The complete opera had a highly successful premiere in Berlin on June 18, 1821, but the overture alone had first been heard nine months earlier in Copenhagen, and was published separately under its own opus number.
The overture is a synthesis of the opera that follows. The slow introduction features a horn quartet, softly and gently evoking the peaceful, romantic forest. A dark shadow crosses the sylvan setting – the evil Samiel lurks about, portrayed by a string tremolo and soft throbs from the timpani. The music of the allegro section is at first stormy and restless, representing the events of the wild, macabre Wolf’s Glen scene, replete with ghosts, goblins, eerie winds and a host of supernatural occurrences. This leads into a long solo for the clarinet, Weber’s favourite instrument. Then comes the heroine Agathe’s theme – a soaring, graceful melody in the clarinet and strings. Throughout the symphonic development, the forces of good and evil engage in a dramatic conflict. But, as in most fairy tales, good triumphs in the end. Following a long, pregnant pause, fortissimo chords for the full orchestra lead to a return of Agathe’s theme, and the overture ends joyously.
Program notes by Robert Markow
I. Prelude: Allegro moderato –
II. Adagio
III. Finale: Allegro energico
German composer Max Bruch (1838–1920) is best known today for really only one of the nearly 100 works he ever created: his G minor Violin Concerto. He began writing it in 1865, just before he became director of the Royal Institute for Music and of the Subscription Concerts in Coblenz. A first version of the concerto was completed and performed in the spring of 1866, but Bruch was dissatisfied with it. A few years later, in a letter to the music publisher Fritz Simrock, he admitted that composing it had been a struggle: “It is a damned difficult thing to do [to write a violin concerto]; between 1864 and 1868 I rewrote my concerto at least half a dozen times, and conferred with x violinists before it took the final form in which it is universally famous and played everywhere.”
Among the violinists he had consulted was his friend Ferdinand David, who premiered Felix Mendelssohn’s Violin Concerto in 1845, and the Hungarian virtuoso Joseph Joachim, for whom Johannes Brahms would later write his concerto in 1878. As extant letters exchanged between Bruch and Joachim reveal, some of the latter’s advice shaped aspects of the version of the G minor Concerto we know today. Joachim gave the first performances of it in early 1868 (in Bremen, Hanover, and Aachen) to great success; soon after, it was taken up by many violinists, including David, Leopold Auer, Henri Vieuxtemps, and Pablo de Sarasate. Together, they helped to establish it internationally as a key work in the concert repertoire, a position it has maintained through the 20th century to the present. Unfortunately for the composer, he never benefitted financially from his Concerto’s popularity. In his naivete, Bruch had sold the work for a single lump-sum payment and consequently received no further royalties, which he and his descendants could have earned until 1990.
It’s not difficult to see why this violin concerto has such appeal, with its strong Romantic sensibility—from the first movement’s gripping drama to the tender passion of the Adagio, and the finale’s vigorous energy and sweeping grandeur. Throughout, Bruch demonstrates his gift for melody, no doubt inspired by the violin itself, which he said, “can sing a melody better than a piano, and melody is the soul of music.” There are, of course, plenty of virtuosic passages for the soloist—quicksilver runs, rapid arpeggios, fearsome double-stops. These, however, aren’t merely displays of technical brilliance against an accompanying backdrop but rather, serve to develop various thematic ideas in dialogue with the orchestra. The result is a concerto with a certain “symphonic seriousness” that demands much from both soloist and ensemble in terms of musicianship and artistic sensitivity.
Bruch’s G minor Concerto has several striking innovations to traditional concerto form. For one, the first movement is entitled “Vorspiel” or “Prelude”, suggesting it’s a preface to the second movement. It opens with the orchestra intoning a solemn motive, to which the solo violin twice responds with recitative-like passages. The movement gets going after that in more typical sonata-form fashion, featuring themes of contrasting character—one rugged, one smooth-lined—that are both introduced by the violin and are subsequently developed. But in an unusual twist, the usual recap of these themes gives way instead to a powerful orchestral episode that leads to the return of the opening recitatives in the solo violin. Now more like a cadenza (here, Bruch had accepted an alteration from Joachim that he said was “written as if from my soul”), the passage gains momentum. A final rapid ascent culminates in a passionate orchestral outburst, one of the Concerto’s most affecting moments, then winds down gradually, ultimately coming to rest on a single note in the first violins that leads directly into the next movement.
The Adagio is rich with beautiful melodies; solo violin first introduces a sustained tune of devotional character, after which it progresses to a more fluid idea. Later, as the violin climbs upward, horns and bassoons intone a ringing new theme of falling intervals that at its climax, the violin picks up and embellishes with cascading arpeggios. Listen out for its return, now with greater intensity at the peak of an inventive developmental episode in which the cellos carry the fluid theme as the violin muses reflectively in counterpoint.
In the finale of the G minor Concerto, Bruch incorporates Hungarian musical elements and the fluid virtuosity of Romani performing style, no doubt influenced by Joachim’s heritage. (Joachim himself had written a concerto “in the Hungarian manner” in 1857; Brahms later composed for the violinist a similarly inspired third movement for his concerto.) Over viola tremolos, the first violins introduce a crisp rhythmic motive, which turns into a fiery tune in double-stops for the soloist. Following a bold orchestral statement of the tune, the soloist sets off on florid passages, which arrive at the soaring second theme—grandly presented, first, by the orchestra, then by the soloist on the violin’s lowest string. Another virtuosic episode ensues, eventually leading to a recap of the main theme. A powerful reprise of the soaring melody leads to an exchange between orchestra and soloist on the fiery tune. Then, as the tempo accelerates, the violin plunges from high to low and back up with wide leaps, after which soloist and orchestra make an exhilarating dash to the finish.
Program note by Hannah Chan-Hartley, PhD
ANTONÍN DVOŘÁK
Born in Mühlhausen (near Prague), Bohemia (today Nelahozeves, Czech Republic), September 8, 1841
Died in Prague, May 1, 1904
The genial, carefree spirit of Dvořák’s Symphony No. 8 has endeared it to generations of concertgoers. Its prevailing happy spirit, idyllic moods and evocations of nature and simple rustic life call to mind other symphonies of a pastoral nature: Beethoven’s Sixth, Schumann’s Spring Symphony (No. 1), Schubert’s Fifth, Mahler’s Fourth and Brahms’s Second.
Dvořák began work on his Eighth Symphony in late August 1889. He was in high spirits and full of creative confidence. He “complained” to a friend that his head was so full of ideas that it was a pity it took so much time to jot them down. “Melodies simply pour out of me.” For this reason, it took him only 12 days to write the composition sketch for the first movement, a week for the second, four days for the third and six for the finale. The orchestration required an additional six weeks. Three months after commencing work on it, the score was ready for the printer, who, in this exceptional case, was not the usual Simrock, but the English firm of Novello. Dvořák conducted the first performance on February 2, 1890 in Prague.
It used to be fashionable to dub this work Dvořák’s “English” Symphony, but the composer himself dedicated the score “To the Bohemian Academy of Emperor Franz Josef for the encouragement of art and literature, in thanks for my election.” The symphony does indeed reflect the composer’s renewed interest in Czech nationalism, and with its dedication to the Academy, the title “Bohemian” would seem more appropriate. Dvořák composed it at his summer home in Vysoká, where the natural beauty and rustic charm of his native country worked its way through the soul of the symphony.
The conditions under which this work was written compare very closely to those under which Brahms composed his Second Symphony. In the case of both composers, we find a symphony of warmly lyric, relaxed character following one darkly serious and grim. To carry the analogy further, both compositions were written in an idyllic countryside setting, which both composers credited with stimulating their creative urges to a greater degree than usual. Still another parallel with Brahms can be noted. Both composers were invited to receive an honorary Doctorate from Cambridge University – Brahms in 1876, and Dvořák in 1891. Brahms declined; he had little tolerance for academic formalities, and he simply couldn’t be bothered to make the trip to England (a personal appearance was mandatory for conferral of the degree). Dvořák accepted, and offered as his “exercise” the recently completed Symphony in G major.
On his sixth trip to England, he attended the stuffy ceremony, but recalled the event in something less than glowing terms: “I shall never forget how I felt when they made me a Doctor in England. Nothing but ceremony, and nothing but doctors. All faces were serious, and it seemed to me as if no one knew any other language but Latin. I looked to the right and to the left, and I did not know to whom I was to listen. And when I realized that they were talking to me, I had quite a shock, and I was ashamed at not knowing Latin. But when I think of it today, I must laugh, and I think that to compose the Stabat Mater is, after all, more than equal to knowing Latin.” Like Brahms, Dvořák felt much more at home in the countryside of his homeland than in a university environment. As part of the presentation ceremony, Dvořák led the London Philharmonic in performances of his symphony and the Stabat Mater.
The symphony’s first movement presents analysts with a puzzle: What role does the opening nostalgic theme play? Is it the “first” theme, or an introduction? Is the “main” theme then the simple, birdlike tune played later by the flute? If so, what then does one call the warmly noble cello theme that follows the timpani’s “rat-a-tat” and the succeeding idea characterized by upward leaping octaves in the cellos? No matter, really. The point is that Dvořák did incorporate a great wealth of melody into this movement. One program annotator (Richard Freed) finds in it “an atmosphere of fairy tales and forest legends… bird calls, woodland sounds and bluff Slavonic marches.”
The second movement, like the first, opens with a nostalgic, rather solemn theme. A second idea in C major offers a new theme in the flute and oboe, accompanied by descending scales in the violins. An angry outburst from the horns leads to a brief, anxiety-filled passage, but sun, warmth and charm soon return.
The third movement is a graceful waltz, which frames a central trio section announced by a new theme in the flute and oboe. Dvořák borrowed this theme from his opera The Stubborn Lovers. The waltz returns, and a brief, energetic coda concludes the movement.
A trumpet fanfare opens the Finale, followed by a charming and carefree theme in the cellos. Simple and natural as the theme sounds, it caused Dvořák much difficulty. He wrote 10 different versions of it before he was satisfied. (Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” theme underwent a similar metamorphosis.) Dvořák then builds a set of variations on this theme, including an exuberant outburst from the full orchestra with trilling horns and scurrying strings. A central section in C minor presents a new march-like idea. When this subsides, Dvořák returns to the peaceful world of the principal theme, which undergoes further variations. A rousing coda brings the symphony to a brilliant close.
Program notes by Robert Markow
Pinchas Zukerman has remained a phenomenon in the world of music for over four decades. His musical genius, prodigious technique and unwavering artistic standards are a marvel to audiences and critics. Devoted to the next generation of musicians, he has inspired younger artists with his magnetism and passion. His enthusiasm for teaching has resulted in innovative programs in London, New York, China, Israel and Ottawa. The name Pinchas Zukerman is equally respected as a violinist, violist, conductor, pedagogue and chamber musician.
Pinchas Zukerman's 2016-2017 season, his eighth as Principal Guest Conductor of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra in London and his second as Artist-in-Association with the Adelaide Symphony Orchestra, includes over 100 concerts worldwide. In January 2017, he served as Artistic Director of the Winter Festival for three weeks of concerts and educational residency activities with the New Jersey Symphony Orchestra. Guest conducting and soloist engagements include the Cleveland Orchestra and Boston, Pittsburgh and Montreal Symphonies, plus overseas appearances with the Berlin and Israel Philharmonics, the Camerata Salzburg, the Sydney Symphony Orchestra, the Korean Chamber Orchestra, the Tokyo Philharmonic Orchestra and the Miyazaki Festival Orchestra. European recitals with pianist Yefim Bronfman and chamber concerts with the Zukerman Trio round out the season.
Over the last decade, Mr. Zukerman has become equally regarded as a conductor and instrumentalist, leading many of the world's top ensembles in a wide variety of the orchestral repertoire's most demanding works. A devoted and innovative pedagogue, Mr. Zukerman chairs the Pinchas Zukerman Performance Program at the Manhattan School of Music, where he has pioneered the use of distance-learning technology in the arts. In Canada, where he served as Music Director of the National Arts Centre Orchestra from 1999-2015, he established the NAC Institute for Orchestra Studies and the Summer Music Institute, encompassing the Young Artists, Conductors and Composers Programs. He currently serves as Conductor Emeritus of the National Arts Centre Orchestra, as well as Artistic Director of its Young Artist Program.
Born in Tel Aviv in 1948, Pinchas Zukerman came to America in 1962, where he studied at The Juilliard School with Ivan Galamian. He has been awarded the Medal of Arts and the Isaac Stern Award for Artistic Excellence and was appointed as the Rolex Mentor and Protégé Arts Initiative's first instrumentalist mentor in the music discipline. Mr. Zukerman's extensive discography contains over 100 titles and has earned him two Grammy awards and 21 nominations. Recent releases include Brahms's Symphony No. 4 and Double Concerto with the National Arts Centre Orchestra and cellist Amanda Forsyth, recorded in live performances at Ottawa's Southam Hall, and an album of works by Elgar and Vaughan Williams with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra.
“Youth sticks with some people… Zukerman seems the forever-young virtuoso: expressively resourceful, infectiously musical, technically impeccable, effortless. As usual, it was a joy to be in his musical company.”
- The Los Angeles Times
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees